![]() |
You are not logged in.
Dear shareholders of this half-dead company.
I offer to buy any CBE share at a price of 0.03. The offer is linked to the acceptation of the major shareholder. I will accept the company as it is now.
If any shareholder want to continue this is my business plan.
Convert CBE is a short term and mid term SL trading fund. Also the business model will be focused to invest in trading technologies and will invest in risk projects with a great projection.
Offline
I think this company and its shareholders died a long time ago, any shareholder who was/is at least partially alive has already sold all their shares downto 0.01 L$ per share.
It should be delisted, and this forum-section closed. (this is nothing but a completely empty listing)
Edited to add:
There are some, who are propably not "dead" shareholders, they speculate to last minute, and that is propably only because defunct companies like CBE, LIF, etc. don't get delisted for clear violations of ISE listing rules (ie: financial reports). This only opens room for theories such as this one, or the one coming from unbonbon, which serves absolutely no purprose other than to bypass IPO procedure (which is a loophole that should be terminated).
And another thing, in this poll: http://www.intlstockexchange.com/punbb/ … 021#p12021
The majority of ISE community already voted to delist this company more than 2 months ago.
Should CBE delisted from ISE?
Yes
65% - 13
No
35% - 7
Abstain
0% - 0
Total: 20
I think it's clear that people want this company (READ: list of shareholders who hold no assets) delisted.
Last edited by AndyGrant (2010-02-12 05:04:18)
Offline
maybe things change.
if new plan are implemented will be new life and a second chance for CBE.
just Cyberted Warrior must accept.
Offline
Cybertek Warrior ceased to exist, together with the rest of CBE management a while ago.
You can still do a Hostile acquisition offer, and approach shareholders rather than the management. (historically HAO's have bringed some magnificent results in SL ;P)
Offline
hostile, friendly, for me there is not different.
An offer is an offer.
Offline
HugoLeckrone wrote:
hostile, friendly, for me there is not different.
An offer is an offer.
It's different, "hostile" is when you bypass the management and talk directly to shareholders, friendly is if you convince the management.
But actually your offer is more like a godfather offer, an offer the shareholder can't refuse... the alternative is that the company will be delisted (sooner or later).
Offline
yes, is their last chance...is better a dime than nothing.
Offline
I know for sure Paci Barbarossa is not "defunct" ![]()
Offline
elialemorigi wrote:
I know for sure Paci Barbarossa is not "defunct"
"The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated". I'm even reading this thread.
I do not know, however, how this can benefit CBE, which - without CyberTek Warrior - is dead,
without exaggeration.
Paci Barbarossa
---
http://www.therockinsurance.com
Offline
ok, is died, then just agree to sell your died shares for a bit of money.
Offline
HugoLeckrone wrote:
Convert CBE is a short term and mid term SL trading fund. Also the business model will be focused to invest in trading technologies and will invest in risk projects with a great projection.
With which resources?
Offline
Small capital injection.
Offline
Offline
of course a good amount will come from me.
but there are several ways to do it.
let say, this is a bit unbonbom ways of doing thigns, except i will not let teh sharehprice being traded above nav at the beginning and I will be creative to join interesting businesses.
I see oportuniteis in the future.
Offline
Offline
im not in favour of james theoryis, but is the only way I can access the market , putting money LOL
Offline
I think like all similar theories (Bernanke is for example a follower of the "Keynes" theory), unbonbon called his the "James theory".
You should find a good brand for this idea, i propose "teoria Angelina Jolie", on every financial report in the background is a picture of Angelina, and then every month investors would more litearlly not look at the numbers but what's behind the numbers ![]()
Last edited by AndyGrant (2010-02-12 13:37:27)
Offline